Archive for the ‘Geekonomics’ Category


A scholarship from big tobacco company led Leila to volunteer as a teacher in Ghana. Seeing her students ambition combined with the rise in global literacy and access to technology, Leila presents the concept of microwork as a way to overcome poverty and participate in the global tech economy.

Leila Chirayath Janah is the founder of Samasource, a social business that connects women, youth, and refugees living in poverty to microwork — small, computer-based tasks that build skills and generate life-changing income.

http://govfunding.eventbrite.com

Women-owned firms account for 40% of all privately held businesses in the US, according to the National Association of Women Business Owners. Yet how many small and start-up business owners are taking advantage of government-backed financing and funding and programs to finance their business? What options are the best fit for your business? Join Melissa Fischer of the Small Business Administration and Julie Lenzer Kirk, co-founder of the Path Forward Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, home of the ACTiVATE program for this soup to nuts webinar on Demystifying Government Funding for Business on April 30th at 2:00 PM EDT.

    You’ll learn:
  • various options for government funding
  • tips for further exploration of SBA-backed loans
  • state and federal government grants

When: April 30th at 2:00 PM EDT.
Cost: $10
RSVP: http://govfunding.eventbrite.com/
Please note that we have limited webinar lines, so please take a moment to sign up now http://govfunding.eventbrite.com/ Details to login to the webinar will be sent to registrants couple of days prior to the event.
Sponsored By: National Center for Women in Technology, ACTiVATE Program, Path Forward International, Women Who Tech, Small Business Administration, Women 2.0 and NTEN.
Cheers,
Allyson Kapin

<ed.note>I made some comments on Facebook re: where were the Tea Partiers when Bush was… Does anyone remember the Reform Party? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_We_Stand_America – this strain of “we want accountability from our government” never disappears and manifests itself in a variety of ways. The Tea Partiers (and anyone else interested in government accountability) would do well to concentrate on the necessary technology — begin with requiring your politician (whatever party) to commit to open budgets expressed using extensible business reporting language (XBRL) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Business_Reporting_Language I would also do well to point out that both political and financial press are afraid to cover this technology as it applies to realpolitik.</ed.note>
<ed.note>O.k., we all know that the real subhead is “And How Planners Can SURVIVE it” but it is interesting to see that the author omits the only real advantage conventions which don’t take place virtually still hold over their non-geo-locked equivalents.</ed.note>

 

How Social Media Is Revolutionizing Community Building – And How Planners Can Manage It

 

By Mickey Murphy, Association Conventions & Facilities, themeetingmagazines.com

During a major conference that her firm was assisting, Julie S. McKown, communications strategist, Fusion Productions, was sitting backstage during a general session of the meeting. On the projection screen, rolling along in real-time, were tweets from attendees in the audience who were listening to the speaker’s remarks.

Also – for the IT folks in the group we have a couple of groups that are geared towards you
Nashville IT Career Network on LinkedIn (IT SPECIFIC) - http:/tinyurl.com/li-tech-network
Nashville IT Career Network on Facebook (IT SPECIFIC) – http://tinyurl.com/fb-tech-network
<ed.note>Reminder: my Linkedin Groups (Medical Banking, Open COMMs, Open Educational Resources, Open Grid, Open Healthcare, Open Journalism, Open Mobile, Project Net-Work, and Technology Nashville). Descriptions and invites at http://bit.ly/linkedin_invites </ed.note>
**********************
04/05
Bill Karlson
BACK TO SCHOOL FOR A CHANGING ECONOMY
04/12
Jerome Terrell
THE MIDDLE TENNESSEE BUSINESS MARKET
Rick Ross
INDUSTRY & COMPANY RESEARCH WITH REFERENCE USA
04/19
Matt LeBlanc
HOW RECRUITERS SEARCH FOR YOU
04/26
Mark Marshall
DEVELOPING A WINNING RÉSUMÉ
05/03
John McClellan
HOW TO REEVALUATE & REINVENT YOUR JOB-SEARCH
05/10
Area Recruiters
RECRUITERS PANEL DISCUSSION
05/17
Dan Miller
“CALLING” OR JUST A J0B?
05/24
Mike Shaughnessy
NEGOTIATING SALARY & BENEFITS
05/31
NO MEETING
06/07
Dan Ryan
BECOMING A SYMMETRICAL LEADER
06/14
NO MEETING
06/21
NO MEETING
06/28
Area Career Coaches
CAREER COACHES PANEL DISCUSSION
The Monday night CTSG meets at the
Brentwood United Methodist Church
(309 Franklin Road in room 281).
Doors open at 6:30pm.

Also – for the IT folks in the group we have a couple of groups that are geared towards you
Nashville IT Career Network on LinkedIn (IT SPECIFIC) – www.tinyurl.com/li-tech-network
Nashville IT Career Network on Facebook (IT SPECIFIC) – http://tinyurl.com/fb-tech-network
Matt LeBanc
**********************
04/05Bill KarlsonBACK TO SCHOOL FOR A CHANGING ECONOMY
04/12Jerome TerrellTHE MIDDLE TENNESSEE BUSINESS MARKET
Rick RossINDUSTRY & COMPANY RESEARCH WITH REFERENCE USA
04/19Matt LeBlancHOW RECRUITERS SEARCH FOR YOU
04/26Mark MarshallDEVELOPING A WINNING RÉSUMÉ
05/03John McClellanHOW TO REEVALUATE & REINVENT YOUR JOB-SEARCH
05/10Area RecruitersRECRUITERS PANEL DISCUSSION
05/17Dan Miller”CALLING” OR JUST A J0B?
05/24Mike ShaughnessyNEGOTIATING SALARY & BENEFITS
05/31NO MEETING
06/07Dan RyanBECOMING A SYMMETRICAL LEADER
06/14NO MEETING
06/21NO MEETING
06/28Area Career CoachesCAREER COACHES PANEL DISCUSSION
The Monday night CTSG meets at the Brentwood United Methodist Church (309 Franklin Road in room 281). Doors open at 6:30pm.

<ed.note>I keep reading all of this business press about techies not being fluent in business and business people not being technical enough — so, what institutions of higher learning are stepping up to meet the need? Also, are there any corporations who actually prove they value this stuff by helping with tuition reimbursement — not just by creating the internal PR but by actually making expenditures?</ed.note>

The Intelligent Information Processing conference series provides a forum for engineers and scientists in academia, university and industry to present their latest research findings in any aspects of intelligent information processing. This time, we especially encourage papers on knowledge discovery, intelligent Web, intelligent agents, machine learning, autonomic reasoning, intelligence science etc. We also welcome papers that highlight successful modern applications of IIP, such as biomedicine, e-Services, e-Learning, business intelligence. IIP2010 attempts to meet the needs of a large and diverse community. Topics of IIP2010 include, but are not limited to:

  • Autonomic computing
  • Automatic reasoning
  • Automatic translation
  • Bayesian networks
  • Belief revision
  • Bioinformatics
  • Biomedicine
  • Business intelligence
  • Cognitive Modeling
  • Computational intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Constraint programming
  • Data Mining
  • E-learning
  • E-services
  • Evolutionary computation
  • Fuzzy and rough set
  • Games & Serious games
  • Image processing
  • Information retrieval
  • Intelligence science
  • Intelligent agents
  • Intelligence Web
  • Knowledge acquisition
  • Knowledge-based systems
  • Knowledge discovery
  • Knowledge engineering and management
  • Knowledge grid
  • Knowledge representation
  • Logics and logic programming
  • Machine learning
  • Machine translation
  • Mobile agents
  • Natural language processing
  • Neural computing
  • Ontology engineering
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Speech understanding and interaction
  • Text analysis and text understanding
  • Web mining
  • Very large knowledge processing
  • Workshop, Tutorial and Panel Proposals

    The conference Program Committee invites proposals for workshops, tutorial and panel. Proposals should be received by one of the program chairs no later than February 1, 2010.

    Submission

    Papers should be no longer than 10 pages including all tables, figures, and references but excluding a cover page. Fonts should be in 10-12 pt. 

    Each submission must include one cover page which should contain:

  • Title of the paper with an abstract of no more than 500 words;
  • A few keywords, from the list above where possible, giving a clear indication of topics;
  • Author names with affiliations, complete postal addresses, and phone numbers;
  • Email address of the contact author.

    The proceedings will be published by the Springer. Please click here to get the detailed paper format. All papers should be sent electronically (preferably in PDF) to the Easychair paper management system http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=iip2010 or through the IIP2010 Website (http://www.intsci.ac.cn/iip2010/ ).

    IMPORTANT DATES

    Submission Deadline 1 April, 2010

    Author Notification 1 May, 2010

    Camera-ready Due 1 June, 2010

    For general information, please contact:

    Sunil Vadera
    School of Computing
    Science and Engineering
    University of Salford
    Greater Manchester, Salford M5 4WT, UK

    S.Vadera@salford.ac.uk

    For paper submission, please contact:

    Wenjia Niu
    Institute of Computing Technology
    Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Beijing 100190, China
    Tel (86) 10-82610254
    Fax(86) 10-82610254
    E-mail: iip2010@ics.ict.ac.cn
    niuwenjia@ics.ict.ac.cn

  • Some GridKa School 2009 Abstracts available here.

    surname first name organisation institute / project
    Jurczyk Melchior Student HS Mannheim  
    Castejón Francisco CIEMAT Fusion
    Nilsson Daniel Chalmers University of Technology  
    Zurek Marian CERN ETICS
    Aktas Adil Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg Physikalisches Institut
    Abad Rodriguez Andres CERN  
    Knese Karsten SCC, KIT  
    Zimmer Artur KIT SCC
    Mehl Jeron KIT SCC
    Stegmann Jens Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim TextGrid
    Jäger Axel KIT SCC
    Haberhauer Franz Sun Microsystems GmbH  
    Braune Stephan Leibniz Universität Hannover, RRZN GDI-Grid
    DAVID Romaric Université de Strasbourg Project Euforia
    Poghosyan Gevorg Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe SCC
    walker rodney LMU ATLAS
    Ressmann Doris Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (KIT) SCC
    Dres Helmut KIT SCC
    Halstenberg Silke KIT SCC
    Möller Klaus DFN-CERT Services GmbH  
    Floros Evangelos GRNET S.A. EGEE
    Jin Xin Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Göttingen OptiNum-Gridprojekt
    Langner Anja KIT SCC
    Finston Laurence Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH, Göttingen OptiNum Grid Project
    Ratnikova Natalia KIT EKP
    Millar Paul DESY dCache
    Pattloch Marcus DFN-Verein  
    Metsch Thijs Sun Microsystems  
    Kemp Yves DESY  
    Jung Christopher SCC/KIT HGF Alliance ‘Physics on the Terascale’
    Jrad Foued KIT SCC / D-Grid
    Gagliardi Fabrizio Microsoft  
    Sutter Michael KIT IPE
    Skole Christian KIT EKP
    Hanisch Tim Uni Karlsruhe ekp
    Bonsch Markus KIT ekp
    Gómez Antonio CIEMAT  
    Stotzka Rainer KIT-FZK ipe / Grid Computing / EUFORIA-Meeting at IPE
    Del Linz Andrea Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. (ELETTRA) DORII
    Gabriel Sven NIKHEF  
    Gutschera Max Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IPE
    Spieß Norbert Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IPE
    Schlichting Frank Sun Microsystems GmbH  
    Neuberger Patrick Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IPE
    Götter Michael Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IPE
    Reißer Sabine KIT SCC
    Berger Joram KIT  
    Dichev Kiril HLRS  
    Mol Xavier Karlsruhe Institue of Technology Steinbuch Centre for Computing
    Verena Geißelmann SCC/KIT  
    Fedynitch Anatoli II. Physikalisches Institut, Univ. Goettingen  
    Landhäußer Andreas T-Systems Solutions for Research GmbH HPC eScience
    Bonn Matthias KIT/SCC SCC
    Baun Christian Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH Institut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
    Wolf Matthias Universität Karlsruhe (TH) EKP
    Stober Fred-Markus KIT EKP
    Zeise Manuel Universität Karlsruhe EKP
    Krauß Peter Universität Karlsruhe EKP
    Hackstein Christoph KIT IEKP
    Oberst Oliver KIT SCC / IEKP
    Tsigenov Oleg RWTH – Aachen  
    Heiss Andreas KIT  
    Schaefer Jan DESY IT
    Baranova Tatjana DESY IT
    Schwarz Kilian GSI ALICE
    Troendle Daniel KIT EKP
    Richling Sabine Universität Heidelberg  
    Seifert Marc Universität zu Köln, RRZK SuGI
    Mauch Viktor SCC  
    Grosse-Oetringhaus Jan Fiete CERN  
    Hejc Gerhard TimeTech  
    Haefele Matthieu University of Strasbourg EUFORIA
    Hoenen Olivier University of Strasbourg EUFORIA
    Bylec Katarzyna PSNC DORII
    Bozic Caslav KIT AIFB / IME
    Navaro Pierre University of Strasbourg EUFORIA
    Mitterer Christoph Anton Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Fakultät für Physik
    Böhringer Stephanie FZK SCC/Gridka
    Clevermann Fabian TU Dortmund IceCube
    Owsiak Michał PSNC EUFORIA
    Grybel Kai University of Siegen  
    Slavnic Vladimir Institute of Physics Belgrade Institute EGEE-III
    Plociennik Marcin PSNC EUFORIA
    Šubelj Matjaž LECAD lab, Fac. of Mech.Eng. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Kulovec Simon LECAD lab, Fac. of Mech.Eng. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Bartsch Detlef Universität Bonn  
    Kos Leon LECAD lab, Fac. of Mech.Eng. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Freitag Stefan TU Dortmund D-Grid
    Scheurer Armin KIT  
    Büge Volker KIT EKP
    Held Hauke KIT / EKP  
    Abbas Zafar Bergische Universität Wuppertal  
    Fernández Enol IFCA  
    Campos Plasencia Isabel CSIC IFCA
    Hau Steffen Universität Mannheim Rechenzentrum
    Martschei Daniel KIT / EKP  
    Heide Lars Forschungszentrum Jülich  
    Schulz Frank SAP Research  
    Büchner Otto Forschungszentrum Jülich JSC
    Manzano Cristina Forschungszentrum Jülich JSC
    Popov Dmitry Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Heidelberg  
    Bozic Stefan KIT SCC
    Farcas Felix National Institute for RD of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies IT Department
    Bystritskaya Elena DESY  
    Gogitidze Nelli DESY  
    Limmer Steffen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen  
    Padberg Alexander University of Bonn Department of Geography
    Berlich Ruediger Gemfony scientific  
    Bender Andreas Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH  
    Fomenko Alexander DESY, Hamburg H1 experiment/Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow
    Poschlad Angela KIT/FZK Steinbuch Center for Computing
    Aldzhanov Viacheslav    
    Koenig Tobias Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)  
    Mei Wen KIT / FZK SCC
    Motzke Andreas KIT / FZK SCC / GridKa
    Dulov Oleg KIT  
    Stadie Hartmut Universität Hamburg  
    Größer Manfred Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH SCC
    Schäffner Ingrid KIT SCC / GridKa

    <ed.note>While legacy newspapers struggle to find a way to monetize their next incarnation (hint: it's aggregating and/or researching data which can be gained nowhere else than from their subscribing readership — imagine think tank-portal-citizen journalism-distributed computing a la SETI@home crunching results), Chuck Martin has been surveying business leaders finding unique real-time insight. My general impression – how many cutting edge leaders are ready for the global digital enterprise enabled collaborative results-only work environment? – um, not so many. An indicator in specific follows: "Business leaders are not confident that their department or organization has an effective plan or strategy to deal with social networking."</ed.note>

    August 24, 2009 – Social Networking for Business
    Summary (survey results below):

    No matter the title or the size of the company, the majority of business leaders have a low confidence level that their department and/or organization has a plan/strategy on how to effectively use social networking for business.

    Sixty-six percent or senior executives and managers said they have a low
    level of confidence and 12 percent have a high level of confidence.
    Twenty-three percent were neutral.
    More managers than top executives have a low confidence level in their
    business' dealing with a social networking strategy, with 74 percent of managers
    having a low confidence level compared to 59 percent of executives. 

    By company size, more of those in large businesses have a low confidence
    level
    (73%) that their organization has a plan on how to effectively use social
    networking compared to those in small businesses (64%). 

    More of those in small businesses (14%) have a high level of confidence in
    their organization's approach vs. those in large businesses (8%). 

    Of the businesspeople who use social networking, 77 percent use LinkedIn, 31
    percent use Facebook, 25 percent use Blogs and 18 percent use Twitter. 

    An earlier study about social networking conducted by NFI Research showed
    similar results.
    Thanks to all who participated in the survey.  

    Detailed Results follow: 

    When it comes to using social networking for business, what is your
    confidence level that your department and/or organization has a
    plan/strategy on how to effectively use it? 

    Extremely High 02.8%
    Somewhat High 09.0%
    Neutral 22.8%
    Somewhat Low 32.4%
    Extremely Low 33.1%

    Of those who use social networking, Which of the following services do you use for BUSINESS purposes? (check all
    that apply) 

    LinkedIn 77.3%
    Facebook 30.9%
    Blogs 24.5%
    Twitter 18.2%
    Wiki 18.2%
    Plaxo 13.6%
    MSN Windows Live Spaces 02.7%
    MySpace 00.9%
    Other 13.6%

    Select responses from NFI Research members: 

    - With the exception of LinkedIn, the vast majority of business
    executives I encounter have little or nothing to do, from a business perspective, with
    social networking sites.
     
    - Social networking is a key strategy for our organization.

     - We currently block and have policies against using social networks
    for business purposes. 

    Thank you for your input!
    If you have colleagues (other senior executives or managers) who you think
    would benefit from participating in our surveys, you may invite them to
    join.

    Just have them go to the following link to sign up for free.
    http://nfiresearch.com/index.php?option=com_artforms&formid=1&Itemid=59 

    Follow me on Twitter @chuckmartin1 

    Best regards,
    Chuck Martin
    Chairman and CEO
    NFI Research
    chuck@nfiresearch.com

    Milt Capps reported on the Nashville Medical Trade Center and the proposed Nashville Entrepreneur Center here. Given today's technology I'd like to suggest that instead of building a PLACE it would be more strategic to offer a slate of SERVICES; specifically, those which would concentrate on the nexus of bioinformatics, cloud computing and distributed computing. With the recent gains in virtualization, the global build out of broadband, and the Obama Administration emphasis on healthcare, eHealth, medical devices and sensors, both the figurative and literal medical home, it seems there's an awful lot of emphasis on the part of executives to re-create an 1980 business model instead of looking ahead at the healthcare horizon. Nashville already has plenty of data centers to throw at this problem; a voucher system to pay for a computing services testbed while companies are bootstrapped is a more prudent first step — not to mention, tremendously less expensive to capitalize. Graduate studies at local higher education institutions, Internet2 and extant supercomputing capabilites at Oak Ridge should all be tapped first before other steps are taken.</ed.note>

    Welcome To Conmergence

    Conmergence Blog is visited by users of over 12,100 internet service providers; read by folks from 8,270 cities and 170 countries/territories. Twitter Grader says @ed_dodds is rated 98.5 out of 100 re: influence.